Current:Home > StocksRekubit-Supreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S. -SecurePath Capital
Rekubit-Supreme Court Halts Clean Power Plan, with Implications Far Beyond the U.S.
TrendPulse View
Date:2025-04-09 13:18:34
The RekubitSupreme Court put on hold the linchpin of President Obama’s climate policy, barring the Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday from carrying out the administration’s new Clean Power Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from electric power plants.
It was a surprising decision of staggering proportions, with repercussions that go far beyond the U.S. electrical grid, threatening the credibility of the Paris Agreement on climate change reached by the world’s nations in December.
The Clean Power Plan, designed to reduce by nearly a third emissions from fossil fuel-burning electricity plants, is the central element of the pledge by the United States to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 percent by 2025.
It was an unusual intervention by the Supreme Court, given that a powerful appeals court had just weeks ago turned down a request by dozens of states and their allies in the fossil fuel industries to impose a stay on the new federal regulation.
By blocking enforcement of the rule, the justices sent a signal that conservatives on the court may be inclined to limit the agency’s powers under the Clean Air Act. The Supreme Court found in its 2007 decision Massachusetts v. EPA that the statute allows controls on carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming.
It would have taken years for the Clean Power Plan to take full effect, but the first step would have been for states to file implementation plans starting in September. Planning was well under way for that. About half the states had joined in appealing the rule, and some of them had declared that they would have refused to file state plans. Now, none of them will have to meet the rule’s deadlines, which the EPA will be powerless to enforce.
SCOTUSblog, an authoritative web site covering the Supreme Court, said that the order “will delay all parts of the plan, including all deadlines that would stretch on into 2030, until after the D.C. Circuit completes its review and the Supreme Court has finished, if the case does wind up there. There appears to be little chance for those two stages of review to be over by the time President Obama’s term ends next January 20.”
Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, said “we remain confident that we will prevail on the merits.” He said the EPA would continue working with those states that want to move ahead with pollution controls under the rule.
“I am extremely disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision,” said Attorney General Kamala Harris of California, one of 17 states that argued in favor of the rule in the appeals court. “The Court’s decision, and the special interests working to undermine this plan, threatens our environment, public health and economy.”
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey, whose state is the lead plaintiff challenging the rule, said “we are thrilled” by the “great victory.”
But environmental advocacy groups said they were confident that the rule would eventually pass judicial muster, and that in the meantime the trend toward greener power would continue.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has scheduled arguments for June and is expected to rule by late summer or early fall. An appeal to the Supreme Court would most likely be decided next year, after President Obama is out of office.
“We are confident the courts will ultimately uphold the Clean Power Plan on its merits,” said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The electricity sector has embarked on an unstoppable shift from its high-pollution, dirty-fueled past to a safer, cleaner-powered future, and the stay cannot reverse that trend.”
veryGood! (28)
Related
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- WNBA investigating $100,000 annual sponsorships for Aces players from Las Vegas tourism authority
- Closing arguments set in trial of University of Arizona grad student accused of killing a professor
- UFC Hall of Famer Anderson Silva books boxing match with Chael Sonnen on June 15 in Brazil
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Mach 3
- Simone Biles brings back (and lands) big twisting skills, a greater victory than any title
- ‘No sign of life’ at crash site of helicopter carrying Iran’s president, others
- 'Most Whopper
- Ohio voters approved reproductive rights. Will the state’s near-ban on abortion stand?
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- The sequel has been much better for Luka Doncic and Kyrie Irving as Mavs head to West finals
- WNBA investigating $100,000 annual sponsorships for Aces players from Las Vegas tourism authority
- The Best Beach Towels on Amazon That’re Quick-Drying and Perfect To Soak up Some Vitamin Sea On
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- What time is 'American Idol' finale tonight? Top 3 contestants, guests, where to watch
- The Israel-Hamas war is testing whether campuses are sacrosanct places for speech and protest
- Kansas City Chiefs CEO's Wife and Daughter Speak Out Amid Harrison Butker Controversy
Recommendation
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
Timeline of the Assange legal saga over extradition to the US on espionage charges
Oleksandr Usyk beats Tyson Fury by split decision: Round-by-round analysis, highlights
Rough return to ‘normal’ sends Scheffler down the leaderboard at PGA Championship
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Many remember solid economy under Trump, but his record also full of tax cut hype, debt and disease
What time is 'American Idol' finale tonight? Top 3 contestants, guests, where to watch
'Stax' doc looks at extraordinary music studio that fell to financial and racial struggles